
Allan Wilson
President - Team Alert
"I was really impressed with how much they cared about our product."
Traditional test automation solves the problem once – then someone has to maintain a suite that costs as much as it saves. AI changes that equation: generating test cases, detecting anomalies, and maintaining coverage without proportional manual overhead. Boldare builds AI-powered test automation pipelines that scale alongside your codebase – without rebuilding what already works.
See the companies that trusted Boldare to get it done.











New features mean new test cases. New test cases mean longer regression cycles. At a certain point, the QA phase starts compressing the time available for everything else – and the team absorbs the pressure without a structural way out.
Automated tests that were written six months ago break when the UI changes. Someone has to fix them. That someone is usually the person who was supposed to be writing new tests – so coverage stalls while maintenance grows.
Some areas are tested thoroughly. Others have minimal coverage because there was never enough time to get to them. When something breaks in an undertested area, it reaches production – and the post-mortem always points to the same gap.
Hiring more QA engineers buys time but not leverage. The ratio of test cases to people stays roughly constant, which means coverage growth depends entirely on headcount – and headcount has its own constraints.
Three phases, each with a fixed scope and a defined output. Start at the beginning or come in at the stage that matches your current situation.
Current process benchmark
A map of your existing test coverage, manual steps, and the points in your pipeline where time is lost most consistently.
AI opportunity assessment
An analysis of which parts of your QA process are the highest-value candidates for AI automation – ranked by time savings potential.
Time savings estimate
A concrete projection of hours saved per release cycle based on your actual setup, not industry averages.
Go/no-go recommendation
A clear recommendation on whether and how to proceed – with a proposed scope before you commit to anything.
Wondering how much time your team loses to QA? – Ask AI to estimate it with you
AI test case generation
Automated generation of test cases from your codebase and user flows – covering scenarios that would take a QA engineer hours to write manually.
Regression pipeline setup
A working regression suite integrated into your existing CI/CD environment. No architectural rebuild required.
Coverage report
A before/after comparison of test coverage across your codebase – with a gap analysis for areas that remain undertested.
Handoff documentation
Full documentation of the pipeline so your team can maintain, extend, and adapt it without external dependency.
Curious what an AI-powered test pipeline would look like for your stack? – Ask AI to walk you through it
Pipeline maintenance
Regular updates to the test automation pipeline as your codebase evolves – so coverage doesn't degrade after new feature releases.
Coverage expansion
Systematic extension of test coverage into areas identified during the Audit or Build phases, prioritised by risk and release frequency.
Release-by-release reporting
A structured QA report after each release cycle – execution time, coverage delta, anomalies flagged, and recommended next steps.
On-demand QA consultation
Direct access to the Boldare QA team for questions, pipeline reviews, and coverage strategy as your product scales.
Wondering what keeping test coverage current with AI actually involves? – Ask AI to explore it with you
The thinking, numbers, and methods behind our QA work – written for engineering teams who want the details.
We've built the most production evidence around the tools below. The AI-assisted QA workflow is transferable across environments – what matters is your pipeline, not ours.





Here's what clients say about working with us.
Product Builders | AI-Native is a community for practitioners building digital products in the AI era – run by Boldare, powered by 20 years and 350+ products of hands-on experience.
We regularly go live with guests from product, design, and engineering for honest conversations about what building AI-native actually looks like in practice. Written recaps, articles, and show notes from every session live on Substack.
The QA infrastructure behind every engagement was pressure-tested internally before it became a client offering. What you get has already run in a live environment.
The automation layer integrates with your current pipeline from day one. The setup works around your infrastructure, not the other way around.
Every engagement ends with documentation your team can maintain and extend independently. Continuing is an option, not a requirement.
From audit through build and ongoing maintenance – no handoffs between teams, no gaps between phases.
Tell us what's slowing your releases down. We'll figure out the rest together.
Answers to the questions engineering teams ask most often before starting an AI test automation engagement.
Classical test automation runs tests you've written manually. AI test automation generates the test cases themselves – from your codebase, user flows, and existing coverage gaps – and maintains them as the code changes. The difference is not just speed; it's the ratio of coverage a team can sustain per engineer – which is why AI software testing is increasingly the default for teams scaling past a certain codebase size.
© 2026 Boldare. All rights reserved.
Boldare S.A. z siedzibą w Gliwicach, przy ul. Zwycięstwa 52, zarejestrowana w Sądzie Rejonowym w Gliwicach, X Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod nr KRS 0000914518, NIP 6312698829, REGON 38958555. Wysokość kapitału zakładowego i wpłaconego 100 000,00 zł.